(04-18-2017, 08:49 AM)willyto Wrote: By the change of sizing I'm refering to the use of numbers (15) instead of S,M,L and so on.
Yes, I know. I forgot that the longsleeve polos were in fact sized in the double size system (S/M/L) as well. Yeah right, double size system would be better.
The following 1 user Likes Nik's post:1 user Likes Nik's post • Edward
Definitely give both. If they're sized the same as the ones folks bought before, it's handy to just be able to order the same size over again. Equally, S/M/L isn't much use first time around because of the lack of any universal acceptance as to what those are.
With regards to the sizing, I hope the cut isn't changing from last years summer shirts. The slimmer fit of the winter shirt isn't something I would want for summer. The looser fit of last summers polo shirts was perfect. I don't want a slim shirt for the summer.
You say 'no changes to the size' but say it is the same of the Oviatt. So that's a slim fit, short sleeve shirt, rather than a loose fit cut like we had last summer.
(04-18-2017, 02:48 PM)Sean Longden Wrote: You say 'no changes to the size' but say it is the same of the Oviatt. So that's a slim fit, short sleeve shirt, rather than a loose fit cut like we had last summer.
That's how I understand it Sean. Personally I'm considering sizing up one size for these... I want them to be looser and more like last years polos also, not a short sleeve version of the winter Oviatt. Plus, my fat neck will prefer a larger size ;-)
My polos from last year are slim-fit. I had to downsize because the size I ordered first was way too large for my neck. The replacements have a nice trim fit.